Monday, June 29, 2009

Zen Retreat with the Cumberland River Sangha


Zen Retreat with Sanchi Reta Lawler
and the Cumberland River Sangha

JULY 10-12, 2009 | Nashville, Tennessee

CONVERSATIONS WITH THE ANCESTORS

or another way of putting it:

Sipping Lemonade on a Hot Summer Day
~~~~~~~

Friday July 10 2-6
Saturday July 11 9-5
Sunday July 12 9-4

From Sanchi Reta as to this "Teaching Retreat" weekend....

"Inside these weekends, it is my effort to promote a living, breathing, dynamic contact with our sitting practice, to find the jewels as to how our practice segways into our daily lives.

It is both a time to clarify questions as to how we deepen this simple yet often challenging practice into 'WISDOM AND COMPASSION', and to support EACH OTHER through the cauldron of natural empowerment and release that is operative when we come together as sangha.

In my life, after many years of practice and contemplation, I am humbled as to the continuous need to create the time and situation to be WITH myself and others in a space of love and devotion to awakened living. A weekend retreat is often the impetus that I need to re-align, to re-commit, to re-connect with the Purity of "WHAT IS," without the endless distractions and interpretations that are operative in our life of speed and highly charged input through our senses. Without question, 'to drop out and tune in' in the expression of simple meditation practice, I come away refreshed, renewed, and inspired to FEEL life with more intuition, love, and mental clarity that is always available, yet often obscured.

The Cumberland River Sangha is a dedicated HEART for receiving practitioners of all levels, to support joy in our interconnectedness, and to create the space for the inner transformation that is available through silence and contemplative sharing. You are always welcome."

Fee: $265

For more information & registration (by June 30)
Contact Pamela Hunt – 615-942-9705
pamelitahunt@earthlink.net

* Sanchi Reta Lawler is fully ordained in the Zen Buddhist lineage, and has been a teacherand practitioner of transpersonal psychology for over 30 years. As well as offering her trademark learning opportunities, Coming Full Circle and Winds of Change, she continues her study and practice of Peruvian Shamanism in the Upper Amazon and High Andes. She is the founder of The Blue Morpho, a service organization which celebrates life with indigenous communities of Peru.

One Dharma Retreat

From One Dharma Nashville:

One Day Meditation Retreat July 25

You are invited to join us in a beautiful rural setting for a day of sitting and walking meditation. This day long silent retreat will focus on mindfulness meditation. We will awaken our minds to the present moment by bringing attention to the breath, the sensations in the body and the pleasant and unpleasant states that arise. This practice gradually awakens us to truth of the constantly changing nature of all phenomena, and we learn to respond openly and compassionately to all that arises.

The hours for this retreat are 8:30 – 4:30. The retreat, led by Lisa Ernst, is suitable for both beginning and experienced meditators; it will include sitting and walking meditation, practice instructions, optional interviews and dharma talk. Lunch and refreshments will be provided. Please bring your own meditation cushion if you have one and two blankets . If you don’t have a cushion, we will have a few extras. Chairs are also available.

Cost: $25, plus dana to the teacher. Scholarships are available. A deposit of $25 is due by Monday July 20. You may bring your deposit to the center during one of our meditation sessions, or mail a check made out to One Dharma Nashville to: 12South Dharma Center c/o One Dharma Nashville, 2301 12th Ave. South, Suite 202, Nashville, TN 37204. The location of this retreat, in west Bellevue, is about 25 minutes from downtown Nashville. Directions to the retreat site and additional information will be provided upon receipt of your deposit. Please email lisa@lisaernst.com with any questions.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Mirror

We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
- Anais Nin

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

The Five Skandhas

Last Friday's dharma study was an intensive on the Five Skandhas, which are a portrait of the ego. We started with two YouTube videos by a western Nyingma teacher, Julian Feijoo, which were quite insightful:



Then we worked our way through the Skandhas, using as a resource book the wonderful book by Mipham Rinpoche, Gateway to Knowledge, Volume 1. His discussion of the 51 mental states brought many "ahas" and "ohhhhs" from the group. The book may be ordered by clicking the link below:

I've also added a Recommendations section to the website where all our resources may be found. If you use the links provided, a portion of the sale will be returned to Luminous Mind.

See you Friday night for more video by the Dzogchen Ponlop Rinpoche!

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Harmless Speech, Harmless Mind

We're well into the second month of the Harmless Speech Agreement. Though it's still early, I'm wondering whether people are beginning to notice a difference in their mind activity.

Do you find that you're not taking others' inventory as much?
Do you find yourself less apt to think negatively?
Are you thinking less of what others are thinking?
Is your mind more peaceful?
Do you feel more loving?

Habitual patterns are deep and it can take awhile to break their hold. But the discipline of harmless speech can help speed up the process of developing a harmless mind.

The longer I go, the more I remember that it's really impossible to know what anyone else is thinking or experiencing. All I can know is my own experience. In fact, all I can know is that I am experiencing. To ponder others is pointless and to comment on them as if I knew their experience is ridiculous.

I learned the value of rigorous speech first from Landmark Education. When someone would say something as fact that was clearly just their perception, they might be asked, "Are you making that up?" At first it was a jolt to the system but it clearly pointed out that if we were saying something we didn't know for sure was true, it was a lie. We all learned to guard our speech so that when we spoke, it meant something. We were taught to keep our word and BE our word. If we said something, it would go down.

A good practice I learned is to catch myself in the midst of mis-speaking and say, "Oh, wait, I'm making that up. I don't know for sure and I could be wrong."

Powerful speech begins with powerful integrity. Can others count on your word? Can you?

Questions to ponder.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

Summary of Video June 12, 2009

Progressive Stages of Meditation on Emptiness
Second half of Talk #1: Emptiness of Self

The meditation begins with the selflessness of person; clinging onto oneself as “me, I.” And then we work on the meditation regarding outer reality. The reason why such a self of individual does not exist as permanent, singular, and autonomous is because the self of individual is made up of the five skandhas (aggregates) -- body and mind. Form skandha is body and the rest is mind: feeling, perception, mental formation, and consciousness. They are all different aspects of mind. Therefore we have to contemplate, when we say I, we are usually referring to one of these five.

Like when we have a strong, migraine headache, we say, “I don’t feel well.” The “I” has now become your head or your body, the form skandha. So we perceive the skandha as form as self of person.

When you cut your vegetables and accidentally cut your finger, you say, “I cut myself.” So “I” refers to your body, your fingers.

With the rest of the skandhas as well. When we feel well, we say, “I feel well today.”
Or seeing a flower, “I see a flower.” So I becomes perception or eye consciousness.

So we move around... "I" becomes one of the five, but we see it as one solid self of individual.

When you look at that, it has all five parts known as the five aggregates, five skandhas. When you look at these, say, the skandha of form, such as this body... it is changing all the time. It is momentarily changing. When you don’t see these moments of change clearly, we cling onto them as one. And we get the idea of clinging onto self as permanent. We feel, “I am the same person I was ten years ago.” Showing a picture, you may say, “This is me when I was two.” Mini-me.

This is a misconception of time. It is all individual moments. Everything exists no more than a moment.

We have plans like, when I retire, I will do thus and so, thinking it is the same me doing that, yet we are going through momentary changes all the time.

So we need to look at each skandha in light of the three forms of ignorance -- permanent, singular, and independent -- and meditate on them.

The third form of ignorance may be the hardest to understand, the notion that we cling onto ourselves as autonomous or independent entities.

It is easy to understand how we cling to our continuum as something permanent. We think there is something called a continuum, and on the basis of that we have clinging onto self as permanent. But if you look at each moment, you don’t find a continuum.

It’s also easy to see how we cling to ourselves as being singular. We don’t think of ourselves as five skandhas. This is the ignorance with respect to objects, clinging to singularity with respect to various objects. How do we mistakenly apprehend objects?

The object for our mind that conceives of a self is no other than the five skandhas. But the skandhas are five, they are not one thing. So the mistake is when the mind sees the five skandhas and takes them to be one.

As for the clinging to autonomy, this comes about because our five aggregates are subject to karma and kleshas (mental afflictions), so our aggregates are subsumed under karma and afflictions, but we have the mistaken notion that we are in control. Yet we are often under the sway of karma from previous times and from our own afflictive emotions.

So therefore we’ll look at the five skandhas in an abbreviated fashion.

FORM

In terms of self, the form skandha is the body. From the tips of the hairs of our head, to the soles of our feet, is the form skandha.

We should look into how it is that clinging to the idea of a self arises in relation to the form skandha.

The body itself does not exist as a singular entity; it is not one thing. It is something composed of multiple parts. We can start at the top of our body and see how many hairs there are, then go to our head and see how many parts, and so on throughout our whole body... limbs, organs, etc. So even to cling to the body as something singular is mistaken, because we cannot find any one thing that is the body.

So when you analyze the skandha of form and see, “Where is this sense of I?” Try to pinpoint. Is it in our head? The hair? We should ask ourselves questions like, “Is our brain ourself? Are the eyes ourself?” and so on. We should ask in this way, proceeding through each part of our body.

This is taught in the Bodhisatvacharyavatara (Guide to the Bodhisattva's Way of Life) by Shantideva.

We should look for a self in our physical body, and when we don’t find, we should rest in the non-finding. Let go.

Shantideva advises that we first need to meditate using the notion of nonexistence as a tool for dismantling the notion we have of existence, because that is the strongest clinging we start off with. So we use the idea of nonexistence as a tool.

When you don’t find any solidly existing self anywhere in the body, rest in nonfinding.

Then you may think, the self is not in any of these individual parts, but in the collection. The whole of the form skandha, for instance.

Then we should analyze, “What is a collection?” A collection does not exist without parts. When we go through the parts of the body and see that they are not self, we exclude them. How does a collection of no-self become a self? That is not reasonable.

So if none of the individual parts are a self, it is impossible to create a self out of parts that have no self.

“Collection” is a concept. From each individual part there are just parts. We put them together as a collection in our mind.

If a collection of all together is a self, if you lose one part of the skandha of form, then you lose part of yourself as an individual. So when you look at this notion of a collection, it is very conceptual.

You can analyze the form skandha down to the particles, but when you do according to modern physics, you divide more and more until you get to quarks and so on, and then space. So there is no solid basis for a form which could be the object of self-clinging.

So we should analyze the form skandha in terms of whether it is permanent, singular, and autonomous.

Singularity
There are a lot of problems that come about if we think ourself is one thing. If our self was one thing and we had a headache, and we said, “I have a headache,” then that only our head was ourself. No other part of the body would be would be allowed to be ourselves. The same with any part of the body that we identified with.

But we don’t think of ourselves as being that way. We think of ourselves as being all the parts of the body.

Therefore it is not singular. In such a way we should analyze ourselves in our contemplation.

So we will do a contemplation now:

When we do the analysis, it becomes helpful to first do a little shamatha meditation to calm the mind. Within that calmness, then you reflect on this notion of self-clinging, clinging onto oneself as “I.”

The basis of such clinging can be realized as the five skandhas. And when you see the five skandhas, go through each skandha. First, try to find the self in the form skandha.

Guided Meditation

  • First, calm your mind.
  • From within this calm mind, look at the apprehension toward a self... the thought that thinks “I,” “me.”
  • Give rise to this thought that thinks “I” or “me” in a very clear and vivid way and observe it.
  • The first basis for this vivid thought that thinks “I” and “me” is the body -- the form aggregate -- so we should look into how this thought of “I” or “me” arises in relation to the body.
  • We should look into where this clinging to an “I” arises in our body.
  • Is this clinging to the “I” found in our head? Our torso? In any of our limbs?
  • When we’re looking at our skandha which is the object of our fixation on a self, we should intersperse this with brief moments of looking at the mind that clings to a self.
  • When we speak about fixation on a self, this is none other than thoughts that think, “I” or “me.”
  • We don’t need to look for anything else. We simply need to look at that kind of thought.
  • Is the self the same as the aggregate we’re looking at?
  • Or are the self and the aggregate different things?

Now we’ll sing a song about selflessnes.

Song: From The Verses on the Middle Way
(from the Noble Condensed Prajnaparamita Sutra)
Know the five skandhas are like an illusion.
Don’t separate the illusion from the skandhas.
Free of thinking that anything is real,
This is perfect wisdom’s conduct at its best.

How does illusion arise on the basis of so many parts and fixations? What Buddha taught in the sutra is that what we experience as a self or the clinging that we experience is simply an illusion, a wonderful illusion.

As long as we want this illusion, don’t analyze, then it’s fine. When you analyze, it’s hard to find the solid existence of this illusion.

Verse by Nagarjuna: Knowledge Fundamental to the Middle Way
Like a dream, like an illusion
Like a city of gandharvas,
That’s how birth, and that’s how living,
That’s how dying are taught to be.

For homework, do the meditation as described above.
First, shamatha,
Then analyze the form skandhas.
If your mind starts getting too far out, come back to your breathing and do some shamatha,
then resume your analysis.
Don’t keep going on with your discursiveness.

Look at the skandha of form and the notion of self-clinging, analyze together, and have the sense of calmness and analysis together.

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Parts is Parts

“Due to having many parts there is no unity, There is not anything without parts. Further, without one, there is not many. Also, without existence there is no non-existence.”

— Nagarjuna, Precious Garland

The nature of reality
is beyond the one
and beyond the many. 

Progressive Stages of Meditation on Emptiness, Week Two: Emptiness of Self

We met on Friday to review the teaching from last week, add material from the book*, and work on the meditation related to this stage. It was a wonderful evening, with plenty of time for questions and discussion. The relationship between the teaching and the meditation became clear, and then we meditated together. Here are a few jewels from the book:

Regarding the three ignorances of seeing things as permanent, singular, and autonomous:
At this stage (of emptiness) one does not consider the emptiness of all phenomena but only the emptiness or lack of self in the person. The importance of this is that it is the clinging to the idea that one has a single, permanent, independent, truly existing self that is the root cause of all one's suffering. One does not need to have an explicit or clearly formulated idea of self in order to act as if one had one. 'Self' here means the implied self which might also be regarded as implied in the behavior of animals. Animals, just like us, identify themselves with their bodies and minds and are constantly seeking physical and mental comfort as they try to avoid discomfort and assuage pain.
(We laughed, because at this point Cozy was complaining that she wasn't being petted.)
Both animals and humans act as if they have a self to protect and preserve and one regards this behavior as automatic and instinctive as well as normal. When pain or discomfort arise, the automaric response is to try to remove it. It is extraneous to the self and the implication is that the self would naturally be happy if all pain and suffering were removed.

Strangely, however, when we try to analyze our behavior in relation to this self, we realize that we are very unclear as to what this self really is. Non-Buddhist thinkers have [sometimes] defined the self variously as resting in the brain, blood or heart and having such qualities as true or transcendental existence in or outside of the mind or body. To have any meaning such a self has to be lasting, for if it perished every moment one would not be so concerned about what was going to happen to the next moment; it would not be one's 'self' anymore. Again, it has to be single. If one had no separate identity, why should one worry about what happened to one's 'self' any more than one worried about anyone else's. It has to be independent or there would be no sense in saying, 'I did this' or 'I have that.' If one had no independent existence there would be no one to claim the actions and experiences as one's own. 

We all act as if we had lasting, separate, independent selves that it is our constant pre-occupation to protect and foster. It is an unthinking habit that most of us would normally be most unlikely to question or explain. However, all our suffering is associated with this pre-occupation. All loss and gain, pleasure and pain arise because we identify so closely with this vague feeling of selfness that we have. We are so emotionally involved with and attached to this 'self' that we take it for granted.

The meditator does not speculate about this 'self.' He does not have theories about whether it does or does not exist. Instead he just trains himself to watch dispassionately how his mind clings to the idea of 'self' and 'mine' and how all his sufferings arise from this attachment. At the same time he looks carefully for that self. He tries to isolate it from his other experiences. Since it is the culprit as far as all his suffering is concerned, he wants to find it and identify it. The irony is that however much he tries, he does not find anything that corresponds to the self. 
....
Then gradually, very gradually, it dawns on him that the reason he cannot find it is that it is not there and never was. There is a tremendous emotional resistance to this realization so it takes a long time to break through, but when it does there is an immediate release of tension and suffering. The cause of it has gone. The cause of it was a mental attachment to something that was not there.
...
The main thrust of Buddhism... is not about theories at all. It is about experience. In particular, it is concerned with the experience of suffering. What Buddhism has discovered is that the experience of suffering is always associated with strong emotional attachment to a vague sense of self. So Buddhism turns its attention onto that strong emotional response associated with that sense of 'self' and asks about how that 'self' is actually experienced. Where is the 'I' experienced?

There was much more, too much to type here. But perhaps this gives clarity as to the rationale for the meditation at this stage. We turn our attention to this vague sense of self and the emotional responses that go with them and turn the light on brightly. This is why Buddha taught vipassana meditation for realizing no-self. One brings attention to the experience of breathing, then notices sensations as they arise, abide, and dissolve. There are great links at the bottom of the last post for this, including guided audio meditations from the Insight Meditation Society.

Homework: 

Try to practice some vipassana meditation every day. And if you are fortunate enough in your life for a strong emotional response to arise, sit with it. Bring awareness to the feeling and ask yourself who or what it is that is suffering. Who is afraid of what will happen? Who feels bad about what happened? From the book:
You will find your thinking is full of contradictions, inconsistencies, and irresolvable paradoxes. This is normal. 
Continue to look for the self that is suffering, and when you do, a shift may occur. When that happens, rest in the shift without looking further. 

Hope to see you Friday night, when we'll look with more precision at the three ignorances in relation to the components we think of as our "self": the five aggregates.


* Progressive Stages of Meditation on Emptiness by Khenpo Tsultrim Gyamtso Rinpoche